R.L.GULATI, T.S.MISRA
COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX – Appellant
Versus
RAM KUMAR NAND KUMAR. – Respondent
The judgment of the court was delivered by
GULATI, J. - This is a reference under section 11(1) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act.
The assessee is a dealer in kirana goods. It was assessed to tax under the U.P. Sales Tax Act on an estimated turnover of Rs. 16,00,000.00 for the assessment year 1966-67. One of the commodities, the turnover of which is included in the assessed turnover, is coconuts. The assessee claimed that coconuts are "oil-seeds" and under section 3-AA its turnover is liable to tax at the rate of 2 per cent. The Sales Tax Officer and the Assistant Commissioner (Judicial), on appeal, have held that coconuts are dry fruits and its turnover is assessable at the rate of 3 per cent. The Judge (Revisions) has agreed with the contention of the assessee and has held that coconuts are "oil-seeds". The Commissioner of Sales Tax is aggrieved and at his instance the Judge (Revisions), Sales Tax, Lucknow, has made this reference on the following question :
"Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, coconut is an oil-seed or a dry fruit ?"
The distinction between oil-seeds and dry fruits is relevant only for purposes of section 3-AA of the Act. Section 3-AA has a spec
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.