SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(All) 40

R.L.Gulati, Satish Chandra, JJ.
COMMISSIONER, SALES TAX, U.P.
Versus
FREE INDIA CYCLE INDUSTRIES.
S.T.A. No. 574 of 1968
Decided On: Decided On : 26-02-1970.

Advocates Appeared:
The Standing Counsel, for the applicant.
M. Verma and B. L. Gupta, for the opposite party.

Rexine covers for saddle seats are not parts or accessories of cycles and cycle rickshaws, and are therefore not taxable at 5% under the relevant notification.

Headnote:

SALES TAX - CYCLE PARTS AND ACCESSORIES - REXINE COVERS FOR SADDLE SEATS - NOT TAXABLE AT 5% UNDER NOTIFICATION NO. ST-1363/X-1045(19)/60 DATED 5TH APRIL, 1961 - REXINE COVERS NOT PARTS OR ACCESSORIES OF CYCLES - NOT ACCESSORIES OF PARTS OF CYCLES - NOT TAXABLE AT 5% UNDER ITEM NO. 34 OF THE NOTIFICATION.

Fact of the Case:

The assessee, a dealer in cycles and cycle goods, was assessed to sales tax on the turnover of imported cycle goods and rexine saddle covers and pads manufactured by it at the rate of 5%. The assessee contended that rexine covers are neither parts nor accessories of cycles and cycle rickshaws, but are unclassified items. The Sales Tax Officer and the Judge (Appeals) rejected this contention, but the Judge (Revisions) accepted it and held that rexine covers would not fall within item No. 34 of the relevant notification.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that rexine covers are not parts or accessories of cycles, cycle rickshaws, etc. within the meaning of entry No. 34 of the relevant notification. The court also held that the entry in question does not contemplate the accessories of a part of the vehicles mentioned therein.

Issues: 1. Whether rexine covers manufactured by the assessee being used only to protect the saddle seat can be called cycle parts or accessories to cycles and taxed at 5 per cent. during 1963-64 under Notification No. ST-1363/X-1045(19)/60 dated 5th April, 1961? 2. If not and they are only accessories to cycle parts, whether even accessories to cycle parts can be taxed at 5 per cent. under item No. 34 of the said notification?

Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted the relevant entry in the notification as referring to parts and accessories of the vehicles mentioned therein, and not to accessories of the parts of those vehicles. The court also held that a rexine cover used only to protect or decorate a part of a vehicle cannot be regarded as an accessory of the vehicle.

Final Decision: The court answered question No. 1 in the negative in favor of the assessee and against the department, and returned no answer to question No. 2.

JUDGMENT

The judgment of the court was delivered by

GULATI, J. - The Additional Judge (Revisions) Sales Tax, Agra, has solicited the opinion of this court on the following two questions :-

"1. Whether rexine covers manufactured by the assessee being used only to protect the saddle seat can be called cycle parts or accessories to cycles and taxed at 5 per cent. during 1963-64 under Notification No. ST-1363/X-1045(19)/60 dated 5th April, 1961 ?

2. If not and they are only accessories to cycle parts, whether even accessories to cycle parts can be taxed at 5 per cent. under item No. 34 of the said notification ?"

The assessee, M/s. Free India Cycle Industries, is a dealer in cycles and cycle goods which it purchases locally or imports from outside Uttar Pradesh. In respect of the assessment year 1963-64, it was assessed to sales tax on the turnover of imported cycle goods as well as on the turnover of rexine saddle covers and pads manufactured by it at the rate of 5 per cent.

The assessee's contention that a rexine cover is neither a part nor an accessory cycle and cycle rickshaw, but is an unclassified item, was not accepted either by the Sales Tax Officer or the Judge (Appeals). Its contention, however, was accepted by the Judge (Revisions) who held that rexine covers would not fall within item No. 34 of the Notification No. ST-1363/X-1045(19)/60 dated 5th April, 1961, as modified by a subsequent notification of 13th May, 1963, issued under section 3-A of the U.P. Sales Tax Act. The relevant entry in the notification reads as under :

"Bicycles, tricycles, cycle rickshaws and perambulators and parts and accessories thereof other than tyres and tubes."

There appeared to have been some dispute the Judge (Revisions) as to the interpretation of this entry. On behalf of the assessee, it was contended that parts and accessories contemplated by the entry were the parts and accessories of bicycles, tricycles, cycle rickshaws and perambulators and not accessories of the parts of those vehicles. On the other hand, the contention of the department was that even the accessories of parts of bicycles, tricycles, cycle rickshaws and perambulators would be covered by the entry. The Judge (Revisions) accepted the assessee's contention. At the instance of the Commissioner of Sales Tax, the Judge (Revisions) has submitted the statement of the case under section 11(3) of the Act.

From a perusal of the relevant entry it does appear that the interpretation placed upon it by the Judge (Revisions) is correct. The phrase "parts and accessories" qualifies the words "bicycles, tricycles" etc. It does not qualify the words "parts or accessories". This means that when the entry speaks of "parts and accessories" it refers to parts and accessories of the vehicles. The entry, in our opinion, does not include the accessories, if any, of the individual parts or accessories of the vehicle.

The only question, therefore, that for consideration is as to whether the rexine covers manufactured and sold by the assessee can be classified as parts and accessories of cycles, cycle rickshaws etc. Rexine covers in question are used as a covering of the saddle or seat of a cycle. The seat or saddle of a cycle is, of course, a part of the cycle because without it the cycle is not complete. A rexine cover in that sense is not a part of the vehicle. The question is whether it is an accessory. The word "accessory' has not been defined in the Act nor is it a technical or scientific term. Its meanings, therefore, have to be gathered from other source. In the New English Dictionary by W. A. Craigie the word "accessory" when used in relation to a thing means "something contributing in a subordinate degree to a general result of effect; an adjunct or a accompaniment". According to this dictionary meaning, accessories would only be such adjuncts or accompaniments of a cycle and other vehicles mentioned in the entry as contribute tot he general result and effect of the vehicle concerned













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top