SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(All) 203

BRIJLAL GUPTA
KAYS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
JUDGE (APPEALS) SALES TAX, ALLAHABAD,. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K. C. Saksena and P. Chaturvedi, for the petitioners.
The Standing Counsel, for the respondents.

JUDGMENT

This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. The prayer contained in the petition is that a writ of certiorari may be issued quashing the order of the Sales Tax Officer dated 28th March, 1960, and of the Judge (Appeals) Sales Tax dated 27th July, 1961.

The facts giving rise to this writ petition are that the petitioner is a contractor who took a contract from the North Eastern Railway to build a certain number of passenger bogies for the railway. The underframes were to be supplied by the railway and the property in the frames was always to remain in the railway. The superstructure over these under-frames was to be constructed by the petitioner. The superstructure was to be raised according to certain specifications. The work was to be completed within a certain time and it was provided in the contract which is an annexure to the affidavit filed in support of the petition that the rate at which the contractor was to be paid for the work will be Rs. 50,200 for each bogie and an additional sum of Rs. 400 for extra work. The work to be done by the petitioner was to consist of "body construction including painting etc." It was provided that "the rate at which






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top