SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(All) 83

IN THE ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
B. Upadhya Bhargava, J.
MODI FOOD PRODUCTS, LTD.
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX, U.P.
Reference under section 11(3) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act (XV of 1948) by the Judge (Revisions) : (Civil Miscellaneous No. 26 of 1951)
Decided On: Decided On : 25-04-1955

Advocates Appeared:
S. Chaudhari and B. D. Gupta, for the assesses.
J. Sarup, for the Commissioner.

Headnote:

U.P. SALES TAX ACT - Section 3, 3-A, 7 - Notification dated 8th June, 1948 - Interpretation - Retrospective effect - Enhanced rate of tax - Applicability to previous year's turnover - Discrimination - Liability to tax - Arising on the first day of assessment year - Retrospective operation of notification - Not permissible - Section 7-B(2) - Not applicable retrospectively.

Fact of the Case:

The assessee, a manufacturer and dealer of non-edible oils, elected the previous year as the basis of his assessment in the assessment year 1948-49. During the assessment proceedings, the Sales Tax Officer held that the enhanced rate of tax laid down in a notification dated 8th June, 1948, should be applied to the assessment. The assessee challenged this decision, and the matter was referred to the High Court.

Finding of the Court:

The High Court held that the enhanced rate of tax laid down in the notification dated 8th June, 1948, could not be applied to the assessment of tax on the assessee's turnover of the previous year. The Court held that the notification was prospective in effect and could not be applied retrospectively to sales that had taken place prior to its issuance. The Court also held that the assessee's liability to pay tax arose on the first day of the assessment year and could not be varied by a subsequent notification.

Issues: Whether the enhanced rate of tax laid down in the notification dated 8th June, 1948, could be applied to the assessment of tax on the assessee's turnover of the previous year.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the notification dated 8th June, 1948, was prospective in effect and could not be applied retrospectively to sales that had taken place prior to its issuance. The Court also held that the assessee's liability to pay tax arose on the first day of the assessment year and could not be varied by a subsequent notification.

Final Decision: The Court answered the question referred to it by holding that the assessee was liable to pay tax for the assessment year 1948-49 on the turnover of the previous year in respect of sales of non-edible oils at the flat rate of 3 pies per rupee.

JUDGMENT

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by

BHARGAVA, J. - The Modi Food Products, Limited, Modinagar, District Meerut, the applicant in this reference under the U.P. Sales Tax Act, is a manufacturer and dealer in non-edible oils. The U.P. Sales Tax Act came into force with effect from 1st April, 1948, and, under section 3 of that Act, tax was payable on sales of various goods including non-edible oils at the uniform rate of 3 pies per rupee on all sales. In section 3 of that Act, as originally passed, it was laid down that tax was to be paid on the turnover in an assessment year by every dealer but there was no clear specification as to which turnover was to be taken into consideration. In Section 7 of the Act, it was laid down that, for purposes of assessment, every dealer was to file a return of his turnover of the previous year within 60 days of the commencement of the assessment year. This provision in section 7 was amended by the U.P. Sales Tax Act (Amendment) Act (U.P. Act No. XXV of 1948) which came into force in the month of June, 1948. By this amendment, a proviso was added to section 7, permitting the State Government to given an option to a dealer to file returns of sales of the assessment year itself in lieu of the returns of the turnover of the previous year under certain circumstances. The mode of assessment was also laid down but, for purposes of this reference, it is not necessary to give the details of that procedure. The dealer had the option of electing whether he would like his assessment to be made on the basis of the turnover of the previous year, or, on the basis of the return of sales for the current assessment year. The applicant, the Modi Food Products Limited, Modinagar, chose to be assessed on the basis of the turnover of the previous year and, consequently, in the assessment year 1948-49, it filed its returns for the turnover of the previous year which, according to the system of accounting adopted by the applicant company, covered the period from 1st June, 1946, to 31st May, 1947. Under section 3-A of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, as amended by the U.P. Amendment Act No. XXV of 1948, power was granted to the State Government to lay down that, instead of sale of certain goods being taxed at the time of every sale tax may be imposed only at a single point in the series of sales by successive dealer. There was a further provision that, in such circumstances, the State Government could lay down that the tax on the sales of those goods at the single point of taxation may be assessed at a higher rate not exceeding one anna in the rupee. The exact language to these provisions of law, which need be considered by us, shall be quoted later on. In exercise of the power under section 3-A, the State Government issued a notification dated 8th June, 1948, in the U.P. Gazette (Extraordinary) of that date, declaring that, with effect from 9th June, 1948, the proceeds of sale of goods entered in column 2 of the schedule annexed to the notification shall not be included in the turnover of any dealer, except at the point in the series of sales by successive dealers mentioned in column 4 thereof under the circumstances shown in column 3 thereof. It was further laid down that, with effect from 9th June, 1948, the rate of tax in respect of the turnover of the aforesaid goods shall be as entered in column 5 of that schedule. As a result of this notification, non-edible oils had to be taxed at single points at the time of sale either by the importer or manufacturer depending on whether those non-edible oils were imported from outside U.P., or, were manufactured inside U.P. The rate of tax in respect of non-edible oils was declared to be 6 pies in the rupee. During the assessment proceedings of the applicant company, the Sales Tax Officer considered the question whether, while assessing the company for the assessment year 1948-49, the uniform rate of 3 pies per rupees should be applied to all the sales of the previous y


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top