SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(All) 87

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
RAJESHWARI PRASAD, J.
Ahmad Ali and others - Applicants
v.
State - Opposite-Party
Criminal Revn. No. 1117 of 1965
Decided on: 10-8-1967

Advocates Appeared:
Keshav Sahai, for Applicant.

In cases where the miscreants have been apprehended at the spot, immediately taken into custody and they continued to remain in custody till they were brought to Court, it would be a farce to require identification test to be held.

Headnote:

CRIMINAL LAW - IDENTIFICATION TEST - NECESSITY - EXCEPTION - ARREST AT SPOT - CONTINUOUS CUSTODY - RELIABLE EVIDENCE - NO REQUIREMENT OF IDENTIFICATION TEST.

Fact of the Case:

Petitioners were convicted for offences under Ss. 399 and 402, Indian Penal Code, and some were also convicted for offence under S. 25, Arms Act. They challenged the conviction on the ground that no identification test was held.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that in cases where the miscreants have been apprehended at the spot, immediately taken into custody and they continued to remain in custody till they were brought to Court, it would be a farce to require identification test to be held.

Issues: Whether identification test is mandatory in all cases involving arrest and conviction of accused persons.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the requirement of identification test is not absolute and there may be exceptional cases where there is exceptionally good and reliable evidence to establish the identity of the accused without there being an identification test. In the instant case, the court found that the prosecution evidence leaves no manner of doubt as to the correctness of the fact that a number of persons were arrested at the spot and those persons who were thus arrested remained in confinement throughout thereafter.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the revision petition and upheld the petitioners' conviction and sentences.

ORDER

This petition in revision has been filed by four persons Ahmad Ali Arsh Mohammad (son of Maqtool), Aas Mohammad (son of Bhurey) and Hibib. These petitioners along with others were convicted and sentenced for offences under Ss. 399 and 402, Indian Penal Code, by Sri S.S. Agrawal, Assistant Sessions Judge, Meerut on 5th December 1964. Some of the present petitioners along with others were also convicted for offence under S. 25, Arms Act.

2. There was an appeal from that order of conviction before the learned Sessions Judge, Meerut which was dismissed on 24th March 1965. Jail appeals in that connection were also dismissed.

3. Sardar Noor Khan (P.W. 1) Station Officer, police station Ghaziabad received information at about 8 P.M. on the 5th March 1964 through an informer that the gang of dacoit Aas Mohammad of Bulandshahr were preparing to commit dacoity at the house of one Niaz Ali Patwari of village Mirzipur in the district of Bulandshahr. He also came to know that the gang for that purpose was to assemble in the guava grove of one Chidda Pandit. Sardar Noor Khan with other police constables left for village Mirzapur. The party of Sardar Noor Khan included Sub-Inspector Azhar Abbas Zaidi, Sub-Inspector Saeshpal Singh and Sub-Inspector Vishnu Datt Sharma, Head Constable Hiredy Ram and other ten constables. Necessary entries in the general diary were made before departure and the general diary is Ex. Ka. 1 on the record. When the police party reached the destination at about 9 P.M., Niaz Ali was informed about the projected dacoity at his house. A large number of persons including licence-holders from the village were collected. Amongst such persons were Inder Nath, Shafiq Ahmad, Fajju, Turab Ali Rashid Ahmad, Munsbii Hashim Ali, Fateh Mohammad, Hakim Ali and Shafi Mohammad. Out of that party, Head Constable Hirdey Ram along with two constables and licence-holdars Hakim Ali and Shafi Mohammad were left at the house of Patwari Niaz Ali and the rest of the party left for the said guava grove of Chhidda Pandit.

The police party divided itself into three groups one of which was under the charge and the leadership of Sardar Noor Khan. When the police party had waited for sometime, two persons entered the grove from the north eastern corner and thereafter one by one six more persons reached there. They started talking in whisper which was heard by Sardar Noor Khan who was nearest to the spot and Sardar Noor Khan beard that they were talking about the dacoity to be committed at the house of Niaz Ali of Mirzapur and that they were waiting for the arrival of the gun-man. Sardar Noor Khan thereafter fired a shot from his very-light pistol which caused a brilliant light. The police party converged on the mis-creants and surrounded them. Seven of the persons sitting there were apprehended while one made his escape good. A search of the person of the seven persons apprehended was made and a country-made pistol (Ex. 7) and five live cartridges (Exs. 2 to 5) were recovered from the person of Ahmad Ali. Ex. 16 another country-made pistol and six live cartridges (Exs. 17 to 22) were recovered from the person of Aas Mohammad. A knife (Ex. 8) was also recovered from the possession of Arab Mohammad. A lathi Ex. 12 was recovered from the possession of Habib. Other articles were recovered from the person of other persons with whom I am not concerned in this revision petition. The arrested persons along with recovered articles were taken to the police station Ghaziabad. Entry was made in the general - diary (Ex. Ka. 10) and a First Information Report (Ex. 9) was lodged. Sub-Inspector S.P. Govil made investigation and the petitioners were charge-sheeted. Alter the preliminary enquiry, the petitioners along with others were committed to the Court of Sessions to stand their trial for offences punishable under Ss. 399 and 402, Penal Code and two of them Ahmed Ali and Aas Mohammad were also charged under S. 25, Arms Act. The petitioners along with other a




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top