M.CHANDRA, GANGESHWAR PRASAD
Laltu – Appellant
Versus
Ram Lal – Respondent
GANGESHWAR PRASAD, J. :- This application in revision came up before us upon a reference made by Tripathi, J.
2. The relevant facts may be briefly stated. One Ram Lal filed a complaint against Laltu applicant under Section 325 I.P.C. in the court of a Magistrate 1st Class at Kanpur, After recording the statements of some witnesses produced by the complainant, the Magistrate framed against the applicant a charge under Section 325 I.P.C. on 22-1-1963. The-Magistrate then fixed 5-2-1963 for recording evidence under Section 256 Cr. P.C., noting in his order that the applicant desired to cross-examine all the witnesses examined by the complainant before the framing of the charge. It appears from the record that on 23-1-1963 the complainant filed a list containing the names of six witnesses proposed to be examined by him under Section 256 Cr. P.C. and the Magistrate ordered summonses to be issued for the said witnesses. The list included the name of one Sri Sinha. Sri Sinha was actually examined on behalf of the applicant on 27-2-1963. On the same day an application was moved before the Magistrate on behalf of the applicant stating that as Sri Sinha had not been named in the list
(1961) AIR 1961 MP 47 (V 48) : (1961) 1 Cri LJ 271
(1960) AIR 1960 All 443 (V 47) : 1960 Cri LJ 881
(1955) AIR 1955 Raj 113 (V 42) : 1955 Cri LJ 1106
(1937) AIR 1937 All 189 (V 24) : 38 Cri LJ 394
(1965) AIR 1965 All 131 (V 52) : 1964 All LJ 335 : 1965 (1) Cri LJ 275
(1960) AIR 1960 Bom 513 (V 47) : 1960 Cri LJ 1569
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.