SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(All) 121

MALIK, RANDHIR SINGH
MOHAMMAD SIDDIQUI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.C. Das, Nazeer Ahmad, N. Banerji, Ashraf Husain, B.K. Dhaon, B.N. Roy

JUDGMENT

Malik, CJ.

[1] Qazi Mohammad Siddiq has filed an application, Civil Misc. Writ No. 3 of 1953, against the State of uttar Pradesh and the District Magistrate of Lucknow, under Article 226 of the Constitution, that the applicant applied for the taking out of a religious procession, Madhe Saheba, and this was unjustly refused by the Magistrate on 26-11-1952.

The prayer in the application is that a writ of mandamus or prohibition or directions or such other writ, directions or orders, be issued, as it may be expedient, to the U. P. Government and the District Magistrate of Lucknow prohibiting them from interfering in taking out of the Madhe Saheba procession and holding public Madhe Saheba meetings by the applicant in the city of Lucknow and directing them to allow the applicant to take out such processions and to hold such meetings under such reasonable conditions as may be necessary in this connection, for which the applicant shall ever remain grateful.

[2] There are three other applications. Civil Misc. Appln. No. 12 of 1954 is by Syed Ahmad Ali that he made an application on 25-7-1953, for taking out a Madhe Saheba procession but it was refused. We may mention here that whil



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top