SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(All) 38

ROY
RAM CHARAN – Appellant
Versus
DEVENDRA KUMAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.N. Mishra, P.C. Chaturvedi

JUDGMENT

Roy, J.

[1] This is a reference by the Sessions Judge of Bijnor recommending that the trial court's order assuming jurisdiction to try the case, be set aside.

[2] The complainant Devendra Kumar is a partner in a cloth firm of Najibabad in the district of Bijnor, styled as Yogendra Kumar Devendra Kumar, while the firm of the accused works as commission agents in cloth business at Delhi. The complainant's case was that it had been agreed upon between the two firms that the accused firm was to purchase 60 bales of cloth from the Delhi Cloth Mills at Delhi as agents of the complainant & deliver the same to the complainant's firm at Najibabad; that the accused was to render accounts to the complainant's firm at Naji-babad, that in consequence of the agreement the accused had first received the sum of Rs. 6,000/-by means of a draft at Delhi, whereafter 63 bales; had been dispatched by them from Delhi to the complainant at Najibabad under a railway receipt "to self" through the Bharat Bank, Bijnor, which Bank was directed by the accused to pass the railway receipt to the complainant on receiving payment of a sum of Rs. 72,000/-; that out of the total receipts of Rs. 78,000 /- which







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top