DESAI, B.MUKERJI
KUMARI SAROJ RAWAT – Appellant
Versus
SECRETARY, BAR COUNCIL HIGH COURT – Respondent
B. Mukerji, J.
[1] This is a petition by Kumari Saroj Rawat under Article 228 of the Constitution of India praying that a writ of mandamus be issued to opposite parties 1 and 2 "to act according to law and place the application of the applicant before the Court for appropriate orders" or in the alternative "to issue a writ of mandamus to opposite party No. 3 directing it to issue a notification under Section 1(3) of the Indian Bar Councils Act 1926 applying the provisions of the Act of 1926 to this Court." So far as the first prayer is concerned we need say nothing since the petition has been placed before us and we are going to make appropriate orders on that petition. In order to see whether or not we would issue a writ of mandamus to opposite-party No. 3, namely, the Government of Uttar Pradesh, it is necessary to state a few facts.
[2] The petitioner alleges that she passed the LL. B. Examination from the University of Lucknow in the year 1952 and that thereafter she completed one year's training "in chambers" in accordance with Rule 1 of the rules framed under Section 9 of the Indian Bar Councils Act of 1926. She further states that she applied to this Court for enrolme
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.