SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(All) 102

RANDHIR SINGH
MURRU – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Kalbe Mustafa, B P Misra

JUDGMENT

Randhir Singh, J

[1] This is a criminal reference by the Sessions Judge of Rae Bareli.

It appears that an application was made under Section 145, Criminal P. C. by one Murru against Sheo Dulari, Sheo Kumar and others on the allegation that there was an apprehension of a breach of the peace between the parties in respect of certain lands.

The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Dalmau, before whom the application was presented, directed the Station Officer, Jagatpur, to inquire and report. He also directed the Station Officer to attach the property if he found any apprehension of a breach of the peace.

The Station Officer submitted his report on 14-11-1950, in which he mentioned that there was an apprehension of a breach of the peace and that he had made the attachment of the property as directed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate.

On the report of the Station Officer the Sub-Divisional Magistrate ordered that notice should go to the parties.

The case was thereafter transferred to Sri Samarjit Singh, Special Magistrate for disposal. Written statements were filed by both the parties. At that stage it appears that Sri Samarjit Singh found out that the Sub-Divisional Magistrate had not record





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top