SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(All) 84

HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD (D.B.)
Agrawal, Roy, JJ.
KALEY
Versus
STATE
Criminal Appeal; Referre Appeal No: 1648 and 1688; 138 of 1953
Decided On : 05 April, 1954

Advocates Appeared:
Simrikh Muni

JUDGMENT

Roy, J.

[1] On the Night between the 27th and 28th of February, 1953, an armed dacoity was committed at the house of Raghubar Dayal and Dhanni Mal at about 1 a.m. in village Piana Kalan in the district of Bulandshahr. The dacoits were 15 or 20 in number. Two of them, namely, Kaley and Atri appellants, were armed with guns and the others were armed with lathis. They entered the house of Raghubar Dayal and Dhanni Mal, overpowered both of them and looted their property. The shouts raised by these two persons attracted their neighbours. During the commission of the dacoity, the neighbours did not actually enter the house. The dacoits, after committing the dacoity, escaped with the looted property. On their retreat, the villagers chased them. When the dacoits had just passed out of the village and were near the Takia of, a Faqir by the side of the field of Raja Faqir, they turned round and made an attack on the villagers who were pursuing them. The appellants fired with their guns. Kaley appellant shot at Ratan Singh who died on the spot. Atri appellant shot at Malkhan Singh who received gun-shot injuries but fortunately escaped death.

A pitched fight took place between the dacoits on the one hand and the villagers on the other at that spot and both sides received injuries. The gun of Atri appellant was broken and the gun of Kaley was snatched away from him. They were both beaten, overpowered and arrested. The other dacoits made good their escape. The two dacoits, who were arrested, were handed over to Khem Chand along with the cartridges that were found from their possession and the cartridges that were picked up from the passage where the fight took place. The First Information Report of the occurrence was lodged at the 'thana' by Dhanni Mal at 7 a.m. on 28-2-1953, the 'thana' being at a distance of 4 1/2 miles from the scene of occurrence.

The police took up investigation of the matter. The 'post mortem' examination on the dead body of Ratan Singh was performed on 28-2-1953, at 6 in the evening. Gun-shot wounds were found on his person. Internal examination disclosed that the 5th, 6th and 7th Cervical Vertebrae were fractured and the first rib of the right side was also fractured. In the opinion of the doctor, death was due to shock and haemorrhage as a result of injuries to neck blood vessels caused by shooting. Malkhan Singh was also medically examined and he had gun-shot wounds. The other persons, who received injuries on the side of the complainant, were also medically examined and 'lathi' injuries were found on them. The two arrested dacoits were made over to the police. The defence of Kaley and Atri appellants was that they were not amongst the dacoits. According to Kaley, he was arrested in the evening before the dacoity and he was falsely implicated. Atri alleged that he was arrested in the morning after the dacoity on his way home and he was falsely implicated.

[2] In support of the prosecution story, Dhanni Mal, Raghubar Dayal, Kehar Singh, Malkhan Singh Raghubir Singh, Rashid Khan, Nanhey Khan, Bam Saran, Parna and Bashir Khan, who were eye-witnesses of the dacoity and who had taken part in the encounter, were examined. Khem Chand, in whose custody the arrested dacoits were put, was also examined. The learned Sessions Judge, after a careful consideration of the evidence of these witnesses, came to the conclusion that a charge under Section 396, Penal Code, was established beyond doubt against both these appellants. He accordingly convicted them under Section 396, Penal Code and sentenced Kaley to death and Atri to transportation for life. He further convicted them under Section 19(f), Arms Act, and sentenced each of them! to one year's rigorous imprisonment. There can be no doubt whatsoever that an armed, dacoity took place in the house of Raghubar Dayal and Dhanni Mal on the night in question and the two appellants, who were amongst the dacoits, were arrested in the manner proved by the prosecution. Both of the










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top