Hon’ble A.P. Sahi, J.—Heard Sri Uma Nath Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri A.K. Tiwari for one Girja Shanker Tripathi, who claims himself to be the Manager of the Committee of Management. Sri Tiwari has been heard in terms of Chapter XXII Rule 5 A of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952, even though Sri Girja Shanker Tripathi is not a formal party in the writ petition.

Sri S.K. Pandey has filed a Caveat on behalf of one Mr. Pateshwari Prasad Pandey claiming himself to be the Member of the Committee of Management. He also supports the stand taken by Sri Tiwari appearing for Girja Shanker Tripathi.

2. The petitioner has come up assailing the order of single operation of accounts passed by the District Inspector of Schools under Section 5 of the U.P. Act No. 24 of 1971. The impugned order dated 3.9.2012 is assailed on the ground that it has been passed in violation of principles of natural justice on the asking of the President of the Committee of Management which approach is absolutely untenable in law inasmuch as there is no default in payment of salary. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that merely because a dispute relating to the Committee of Ma