S.P.MEHROTRA, PRAKASH KRISHNA, R.K.AGRAWAL
GAURAV ASEEM AVTEJ – Appellant
Versus
CHIEF CONTROLLING REVENUE AUTHORITY, U. P. ALLAHABAD – Respondent
By the Court.—Disagreeing with the Division Bench decision of this Court in the case of Syed Mahfooj Hussain v. State of U.P. and others, 2003 (52) ALR 346, a co-ordinate Bench had referred this matter alongwith five connected matters to be decided by a larger Bench.
Facts of the Case :
2. Since all these writ petitions relate to the same issue, the same have been heard and are being decided by a common order. Writ Petition No. 57850 of 2009 is being treated as the leading petition and its facts are being given.
3. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has sought a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari declaring the U.P. Act No. 38 of 2001 by which the proviso to clause 1-A was added to Section 56 of the (Indian) Stamp Act, 1899 as ultra vires to the Constitution of India as the condition to deposit 1/3rd amount is also not applicable in filing the revision. The petitioner further prays for a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the recovery certificate for the dues of stamp duty dated 18.8.2009 issued by the Tehsildar, Bijnor filed as Annexure 17 to the writ petition which has been issued in pursuance to the order dat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.