SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(All) 2811

SUDHIR AGARWAL
ROSHAN LAL – Appellant
Versus
RISHI PAL SINGH – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
K.M. Garg for the Petitioners; Mahipal Singh for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.—Heard. Since pleadings are complete, the Court proceed to decide the case finally at this stage under the Rules of the Court.

2. The dispute relates to a shop situated at village Tatarpur Laluwala, Mohalla Adarsh Nagar, Najibabad, District Bijnor. The shop is owned by petitioners and respondent Nos. 2 and 3. The aforesaid shop was let out to respondent No. 1. Claiming that construction of shop was made in 1989, provisions of Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as “Act, 1972”) are not applicable and since there was a default in payment of rent for more than two years i.e. from 1.9.1998, petitioners and respondent Nos. 3 and 4 vide notice dated 8.2.2001 determined tenancy of respondent No. 1 and thereafter filed suit No. 75 of 2002 for ejectment and recovery of arrears of rent. It was decreed ex parte by the Court of Small Cause, Bijnor vide judgment dated 9.5.2003.

3. The respondent No. 1 filed an application dated 21.5.2003 under Order IX, Rule 13 C.P.C. for setting aside ex parte decree, which was registered as Misc. Case No. 19 of 2003. It was neither accompanied by deposit














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top