SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(All) 134

UMA NATH SINGH, RAN VIJAI SINGH
CHANDRA PRAKASH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Sanjay Chaturvedi and Subodh Pandey for the Petitioner; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

ORDER

By the Court.—We have heard learned counsel for parties and perused the pleadings of writ petition.

It appears from the pleadings of writ petition that the petitioner was appointed on 1.11.1975 as a Medical Officer by the U.P. Public Service Commission and joined as such on 12.12.1975. He was superannuated on 31.5.2011 from the post of Joint Director, Health Service, Government of U.P. His service conditions are governed by the provisions of U.P. Medical and Health Services Rules, 2004 and the amended provisions of the Act as well as Rules framed thereunder. In the month of May, 2005, he was promoted as Joint Director and on 28.4.2010 he was given further promotion to the post of Additional Director. Thus on promotion to the post of Additional Director, he relinquished the charge and submitted the charge certificate. On that date there was no pending disciplinary proceeding whatsoever against him. However, the said charge certificate was not counter signed by the Director (Administration), Department of Health. On an oral inquiry it was informed to the petitioner that in some disciplinary proceedings a censure entry was recorded for the year 2009-10 against him. It was also inf








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top