SUDHIR AGARWAL
RAJ KUMAR GAUTAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Hon’ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.—Writ petition has been restored to its original number vide order of date passed on recall application. As requested by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and is being disposed of finally.
2. This writ petition is directed against the punishment order dated 25.1.2009 and the appellate order dated 11.7.2009 whereby the punishment of withholding of integrity has been imposed by petitioner and his appeal thereagaisnt has been rejected.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the said punishment is without jurisdiction since under Rule 4 of U.P. Police officers of the Subordinate Ranks (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1991 (hereinafter referred to as the “Rules, 1991”) there is no such punishment like withholding of integrity and, therefore, imposition of said punishment is wholly without jurisdiction. He placed reliance on an Apex Court’s decision in State Bank of India and others v. T.J. Paul, JT 1999(3) 385 and a recent decision in Vijay Singh v. State of U.P. and others, JT 2012(4) SC 105, wherein the Apex Court has said that punishment not prescribed in Rules cannot be imposed upon a delinquent e
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.