SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(All) 3337

[2013(2) ADJ 385 (DB)]
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : RAKESH TIWARI AND ANIL KUMAR SHARMA, JJ.
BALDEO AND ANOTHER ....Appellants
Versus
STATE OF U.P. ......Respondent
(Criminal Appeal No. 2465 of 2002, decided on 20th December, 2012)

Advocates:
Counsel :
Apul Misra, Kamla Srivastava and Smt. Durga Tiwari (Amicus curiae) for Appellants; S.A. Murtaza and A.G.A. for the Respondent.

Headnote:(A) (Indian) Penal Code, 1860—Sections 302/34 and 120-B—Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Sections 164, 313 and 281—Evidence Act, 1872—Section 27—Murder—Confessional statement—Reliability of—Admittedly, there is no direct evidence of incident—Case solely rests on circumstantial evidence—Several circumstances not put to any accused in their respective statements under Section 313—In present case confessional statements suffer from material irregularities and illegalities—Statements doubtful—Magistrate cannot administer oath to accused before recording his confessional statement—Mere certificate under Section 164 not sufficient—Willingness to record judicial confession not enquired from accused—Retracted confessional statement not reliable—Conviction unsustainable. [Paras 11, 13, 16, 18, 20 and 21]

       (B) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Section 313—Examination of accused—Object of—It is to establish a direct communication between Court and accused. [Para 12]

       (C) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Section 164—Confessional statement—Recording of—Section 164 provides guidelines for. [Para 13]

       

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Anil Kumar Sharma, J.—Challenge in this appeal is the judgment and order dated 10.5.2002, passed by learned Sessions Judge, Lalitpur in S.T. No. 45 of 2001, under Section 302, 120-B IPC, P.S. Jakhaura, District Lalitpur, whereby appellant Baldeo has been convicted under Section 302 IPC and Smt. Deoki alias Deokia has been convicted under Section 302/34 IPC and each had been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life. Smt. Deoki alias Deokia has further been convicted under Section 120-B IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for a period of two years.

2. The facts germane to the appeal are that on 19.3.2001 at about 10.30 a.m. complainant Chhotey Lal son of Mauzi Aharwar resident of Rajpur submitted a written report to the police station Jakhaura, wherein he has stated that his cousin Ramoo son of Daulati aged about 32 years used to go to Khaliyan for guarding the crop near Gulkunda Kua. In the night of 18/19.3.2001 he was at the aforesaid field. On 19.3.2001 at 8.00 a.m. when the complainant reached at the aforesaid Kua, he found that Ramoo is lying dead on the cot. There were injuries on his neck. He has been done to death with axe by some unknown persons in the night. On the basis of this report, case No. 56 of 2001 under Section 302 IPC was registered at police station Jakhaura against unknown persons, investigation whereof was taken up by S.O. Sri J.P. Pandey. He reached at the spot and interrogated the complainant there. The inquest on the dead body of the deceased was conducted and in sealed cover it was sent for post-mortem examination along with usual papers. He inspected the spot, prepared site plan and seized plain and blood stained earth as also blood stained Kathri, Rassi of the cot, Sira Patti and its legs through memo Ext. 19. Thereafter he interrogated other witnesses. During investigation complicity of accused Baldeo was revealed. On 21.3.2001 accused Baldeo was interrogated and he allegedly confessed to have killed the deceased and on his pointing out blood stained axe used in the crime was recovered. Thereafter the I.O. recovered the blood stained axe, blood stained wearing apparels of Baldeo through Memo Ext. Ka-4. It was also revealed that accused Baldeo was having illicit relations with accused Smt. Deoki and both of them conspired together to eliminate the deceased. Accused Deoki was also arrested and at her instance the old clothes with which blood stains of axe were removed was recovered through Memo Ext. Ka-5.

3. Dr. R.P. Gupta, PW6 conducted autopsy upon the cadaver of the deceased on 20.3.2001 at 1.30 p.m. He found that 32-years old deceased was having average built body. Rigor mortis had passed of from the neck but partially present over both upper and lower limbs, abdomen was distended, decomposition blisters were present over the lower abdomen and both inguinal region. Genitals swollen, greenish particles at places over lower abdomen. Both eyes were half open. The doctor found the following ante-mortem injuries on the person of the deceased:

1. An incised wound 9.0 cm x 2.0 cm x bone deep, over posterior lateral aspect of right side neck, 7.0 cms below right ear, edges clean cut, in which 1.0 cm long tailing was present posteriorly and underline (SIO) vessels, muscles, vertebrae C-3 spinal cord had blood blood clots and dried blood. The wound was slightly oblique directing posteriorly and upward;

2. An incised wound, 12.0 cms x 2.5 cms x bone deep over posterio lateral aspect of right side neck direction obliquely and slightly upwards and posteriorly, edges of which were clean cut, 1.5 cms tailing present posteriorly. Underlying SIO, vessels, muscles, C-2 vertebrae and spinal cord were cut, 1.0 cm above injury No. 1. Lower SIO of right mandible was also cut. Blood clot and dried blood present over the wound and around.

3. An incised wound 5.0 cms x 2.0 cms x muscle deep, overlapping injury No. 2 posteriorly, underlying s.i.o vessels, muscles were cut obliquely, directed posteriorly and u


















































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top