SURENDRA VIKRAM SINGH RATHORE
HANUMAN PRASAD SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Hon’ble Surendra Vikram Singh Rathore, J.—Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Chief Standing Counsel for the opposite parties.
2. Since both these writ petitions are interrelated, therefore, they were heard together and are being disposed of by a common judgment.
3. The petitioner Hanuman Prasad Singh was appointed on the post of untrained Assistant Teacher by the Education Superintendent, Sultanpur vide order dated 5.12.1965 and was posted in Primary School Ballua, Development Block Akhand Nagar District Sultanpur. In pursuance of the aforementioned appointment letter he joined his duty as such on 6.12.1965 and since then he was continuously working and discharging his duties on the aforesaid post. During continuance of his service on 27.7.1974 he was placed under suspension but no enquiry was conducted for long time, therefore, he challenged the said suspension order in Writ Petition No. 1849 (S/S) of 1998 and this Court by an interim order dated 2.5.1998 directed as under :
“It is therefore, directed that the operation of the impugned order of suspension dated 27.7.1974, shall remain stayed until furthers. Respondents are further directed to pay salary t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.