RAMESH SINHA
DEEPAK SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Heard Sri Manish Tiwary, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Anil Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2.
By means of the present 482 application, the applicant has prayed for quashing the order dated 2.11.2012 passed in Case No.107 of 2012, Case Crime NO.285 of 2012, u/s 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 506 IPC, P.S. Aurai, distsrict Sant Ravidas Nagar/Bhadohi and to direct the A.C.J.M., Bhadohi Gyanpur to direct the I.O. to have the specimen signatures of the first informant taken in Court and sent the same for analysis with the dispute signatures.
The brief facts are that on 21.8.2012, the informant came to know that the applicant along with other co-accused persons had executed a sale-deed with respect to the plot no.314, 323, 317, 318, 319, 320, 322, 315 and 316 Ka situated at Mauja Kathaura, P.S. Aurai, district Sant Ravi Das Nagar in his village and he went to the Tehsil Aurai and obtained a copy of Khatauni from his counsel and he came to know that on 15.6.2012, in a mutation proceedings, bearing case no.542 of 2012, the name of the applicant Deepak Singh has been mutated on the basis of forged and fictitious documents in the place of the informan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.