SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(All) 58

GHULAM HASAN, KIDWAI, CHANDIRAMANI
Janki Sahu Trust – Appellant
Versus
Ram Palat – Respondent


Advocates:
B.D. Srivastava - for Appellant. H.N. Das and Kesri Bir Prasad - for Respondent.

Judgement

GHULAM HASAN, J. :- This execution of decree appeal has been referred to the Full Bench by Hon. M.H. Kidwai, J., on the ground that there was a conflict of authority in the various High Courts in India upon the question of law arising in the case.

2. The facts are few and simple. Janki Sahu Trust obtained a simple money decree from the Civil Judge of Sultanpur exercising jurisdiction as a Small Cause Court against Sheo Ghulam deceased for Rs. 300 on 31st May 1930. The decree was transferred to the Munsif not vested with Small Cause Court powers for execution. Three unsuccessful applications for execution were made and we are concerned with the fourth application, which was the last, made on 5th March 1942. It is not denied that the limitation for execution of the decree expired on 31st May 1942. In the application above referred to four plots Nos. 248, 913, 919 and 964 described as groves were sought to be attached and sold in addition to certain houses belonging to the judgment-debtor, Sheo Ghulam died and is represented by his heir and legal representative, Ram Palat. It appears from the record that objections were filed by several persons to execution on the ground that




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top