SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(All) 188

BIND BASNI PRASAD, MUKERJI
Parasram Shukul – Appellant
Versus
Bindeshari Pandey – Respondent


Advocates:
K.L. Misra and C.B. Misra - for Applicant; R.R. Prasad - for Respondents.

Judgement

BIND BASNI PRASAD, J.:- This is a mortgagors petition in revision from the judgment, dated 15th May 1948, passed by the learned District Judge of Gorakhpur upholding the judgment dated 15th April 1946, given by the learned Sub-divisional Officer of Deoria. It arises out of proceedings under S.12, U.P. Agriculturists Relief Act. The relevant facts are as follows :

On Jeth Sudi 15, 1881 A.D. a usufructuary mortgage in respect of an agricultural plot was made by the applicants ancestors to the opposite parties predecessors. On 1st March 1944, that is to say, more than sixty years after the date of the mortgage, the application for redemption was filed. The applicant contended that in the year 1911, there was an acknowledgment of the mortgage and so the case was saved from the operation of the bar of limitation. It was further contended that according to the provisions of S.9, U.P. Debt Redemption Act, 1940, there was a fresh start of limitation when that Act came into force, viz., on 1st January 1941. The trial Court held that the case was barred by limitation and learned District Judge upheld that order. The mortgagor, therefore, comes in revision.

2. The first question is whe

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top