SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(All) 241

KAUL
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Girish Chandra – Respondent


Advocates:
B.N. Roy, for Applicant; Hyder Husain, Ganesh Prasad and A.N. Trivedi, for Opposite Party Nos.1 to 3.

ORDER :-This is an application for revision of an order passed by the learned Judge, Small Cause Court, Lucknow. The material facts lie within a short compass:

2. A suit for recovery of rent for certain premises was instituted by Shekhar Chandra Jain against the Union of India, Defence Department. Shekhar Chandra Jain died during the pendency of the suit and the names of his legal representatives were substituted in his place on the record. The suit was instituted on 13th May 1950 18th August 1950 was fixed for final disposal of the case. On that day the Additional Government Pleader for the U.P. Government appeared before the Court and prayed for an adjournment. The application made by him stated that as he had not received a copy of the plaint or other papers from the office concerned, he might be granted two months time for filing the written statement. This application was allowed and time was granted till 13th October 1950. On that day an application was made by the plaintiff inviting the Courts attention to S.34 of the Arbitration Act 10 of 1940. It was contended that as the application for adjournment of the case to enable the defendant to file a written statement made on 18t












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top