SANKAR SARAN, BRIJ MOHAN LALL
Radha Krishen Pratap Singh – Appellant
Versus
H. S. Bates – Respondent
Brij Mohan Lal, J. :- This and the connected appeal No.7 of 1948 are two appeals by the plaintiff under S.12(2), Oudh Courts Act (4 of 1925) against two decrees of a learned single Judge of the erstwhile Chief Court. The appeals were preferred before the amalgamation of the Chief Court with the All. High Court.
2. The plaintiff is one Kunwar Radha Krishna Pratap Singh who was formerly the Assistant Manager of the Balrampur Estate. The appellant happens also to be related to the Maharaja, i.e., the proprietor of the estate. He brought the suit, which has given rise to these two appeals, to recover a sum of Rs.2000 as damages for slander and libel against four persons, namely, (1) H.S. Bates, I.C.S., Manager of the estate, (2) Y.A. Dikshit, Confidential Adviser to the Maharani Saheba, (3) V.V. Singh, Private Secretary to the Maharaja and (4) the Maharaja. In the plaint, as originally filed, damages were claimed against the first three defendants only, and it was stated that the Maharaja, defendant 4, was a pro forma defendant. Later on the plaintiff got his plaint amended and claimed damages against the Maharaja also.
3. The taluqa known as Balrampur Estate was formerly under
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.