BEG
Bachchu Singh – Appellant
Versus
Harbans Singh – Respondent
2. The main defence set up on behalf of the defendant-respondent Harbans Singh was that there was a settlement between the parties to the suit in the year 1932, according to which the plaintiff was entitled to only a half share in the property in suit.
3. The trial Court upheld the plea of the defendant-respondent and decreed the plaintiffs suit for possession to the extent of two pies share and dismissed it in respect of the remaining two pies share in the property in dispute.
4. The plaintiff went up in appeal and the lower appellate court upheld the judgment and decree of the trial court. The plaintiff has filed a second appeal in this Court and the main contention urged on behalf of the appellant by his learned counsel is that the settlement in question is bad in law a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.