MALIK, V. BHARGAVA
Deo Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Commr. of Income-tax, U. P. – Respondent
MALIK, CJ.:- Mr. Das on behalf of the opposite party has raised a preliminary objection and has pointed out that the order passed by the Income-tax Officer was under S.18-A (6), Income-tax Act. The assessee having paid in advance less than eighty per cent, of the tax determined on the basis of the regular assessment he was made liable to pay simple interest at the rate of six per cent. per annum. Learned counsel has drawn our attention to the provisions of S.30 (1), Income-tax Act and has pointed out that the order under S.18-A (6) was not appealable. An appeal was, however, filed by the assessee before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner but no objection was raised to the maintainability of the appeal and the Appellate Assistant Commissioner dismissed the appeal on the merits. Then there was a further appeal filed under S.33 (1) before the Appellate Tribunal which also dismissed the appeal on the merits. Learned counsel has pointed out that the order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and the Tribunal being completely without jurisdiction, the order of the Appellate Tribunal cannot be deemed to be an order under S.33. In case the Appellate Assistant Commissioner or
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.