BIND BASNI PRASAD
Behari Lal – Appellant
Versus
Radhye Shyam – Respondent
2. The defendant contended that the plaintiff was utterly negligent about the repairs of the bungalow and he (the defendant) was compelled to incur an expenditure of Rs.477/1/9 to keep the bungalow in reasonable repairs. He claimed that he was entitled under the law to a credit of this amount towards the rent due from him. On this ground, he pleaded that the suit should be dismissed.
3. Learned Judge of the Small Causes came to the conclusion that the plaintiff was negligent in keeping the house in repairs, but the defendant should not have spent a sum of Rs.477/1/9. In the opinion of the learned Judge, the defendant should have spent an amount of Rs.100/- every year on the repairs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.