SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(All) 151

HIGH COURT OF ALLAHBAD
B. D. MUKERJI, J.
Basheshwar Nath
Versus
State
Criminal Misc. Case No. 1042 of 1953
Decided On : 21-07-1953

Advocates:
Gyanchandra Kumar, for Applicant; Brij Lal Gupta, for the State.

Headnote:

Jurisdiction - Transfer of Case - Interpretation of U.P. High Courts (Amalgamation) Order, 1948

Fact of the Case:

The application sought the transfer of a case pending in the Court of Sri A.N. Singh, Judicial Magistrate 1st class, Hardoi, to a Magistrate at Allahabad.

Finding of the Court:

The Court found that it had no jurisdiction to entertain the application for transfer as the case was pending within the jurisdiction of the Lucknow Bench, and the U.P. High Courts (Amalgamation) Order, 1948, determined the venue for such applications.

Issues: The primary issue was whether the High Court had jurisdiction to entertain the application for transfer of the case from Hardoi to Allahabad.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court interpreted the U.P. High Courts (Amalgamation) Order, 1948, and held that the jurisdiction of the original matter determined the jurisdiction of the Bench under the order.

Final Decision: The application for transfer was dismissed as unentertainable by the Court due to lack of jurisdiction.

ORDER :- This is an application for the transfer of a case pending in the Court of Sri A.N. Singh, Judicial Magistrate 1st class, Hardoi, to some Magistrate at Allahabad, competent to try it.

2. On behalf of the State a preliminary objection is taken to the hearing of this application by this Court on the ground that this Court has no jurisdiction under the provisions of the U.P. High Courts (Amalgamation) Order, 1948, inasmuch as the case in respect of which relief is claimed from this Court is pending within the jurisdiction, of the Lucknow Bench or is one in respect of which the Lucknow Bench alone can exercise jurisdiction.

3. The relevant clause in the Amalgamation Order is cl. 14. Clause 14 is in these words :

"The new High Court, and the Judges and Division Courts thereof, shall sit at Allahabad or at such other places in the United Provinces as the Chief Justice may, with the approval of the Governor of the United Provinces, appoint :

Provided that unless the Governor of the United Provinces, with the concurrence of the Chief Justice, otherwise directs, such judges of the new High Court, not less than two in number, as the Chief Justice may, from time to time nominate, shall sit at Lucknow in order to exercise in respect of Cases arising in such areas in Oudh, as the Chief Justice may direct, the jurisdiction and power for the time being vested in the new High Court :

Provided further that the Chief Justice may in his discretion order that any case or class of cases arising in the said areas shall be heard at Allahabad."

4. From the above it will be apparent that the first proviso to cl. 14 is really the material provision which determines the venue of this application for transfer. There can be no doubt that the case out of which this application has arisen is pending within the area over which the Lucknow Bench exercises jurisdiction. While dealing with an application for the transfer of a case a Court must be deemed to be exercising jurisdiction in respect of a case which has arisen within a certain territorial area or jurisdiction. In my judgment the position of an application for the transfer of a case is not any different from that of an application in revision or an appeal so far as the auction of the higher Courts territorial jurisdictional powers qua that case is concerned.

The High Court, when, it is called upon to determine, in respect of a case pending in Hardoi which falls within the jurisdiction of the Lucknow Bench, whether that case should or should not be transferred, it is called upon, without doubt, to exercise its powers in respect of a case which has arisen within such jurisdiction. The fact that a prayer has been made for the transfer of the case to Allahabad, which place is within the jurisdiction of the Allahabad Bench, should make no difference for the reason that the case in respect of which the High Court is exercising its powers of transfer is not in respect of a case arising within the jurisdiction of the Allahabad Bench : it is the jurisdiction of the original matter that determines the jurisdiction of the Bench - Lucknow or Allahabad - under the U.P. High Courts (Amalgamation) Order.

5. From what I have stated above it appears to me that the preliminary objection must prevail. I accordingly dismiss this application as being unentertainable by me.

Application dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top