SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(All) 163

MALIK, AGARWALA
Badri Narain Lal – Appellant
Versus
Badri Narain Lal – Respondent


Advocates:
Niamatullah, for Appellant; Hyder Husain, for Respondent No. 1.

Judgement

MALIK, CJ. :- These are two connected appeals. Second appeal No. 323 of 1946 has been filed against the decree passed by the lower Court in a suit for ejectment and for certain other reliefs, while the connected appeal, execution of decree appeal No. 21 of 1947 has been filed against the order passed in execution proceedings dismissing an objection under S. 47, Civil P.C. by the judgment-debtor.

2. Learned Counsel for the respondent raised a preliminary objection that the second appeal is incompetent. The trial Court had decreed the suit filed by the plaintiff but had directed the plaintiff to pay the costs incurred by defendant No. 2 and to pay in addition a sum of Rs. 25/- as compensatory costs. The defendants had submitted to the decree, but the plaintiff had filed an appeal against the portion of the decree directing him to pay costs and in addition compensatory costs. The appeal was allowed and the lower appellate Court set aside the order of the trial Court awarding costs and compensatory costs to defendant No. 2, against the plaintiff. The defendants have filed an appeal now really not against the order passed by the lower appellate Court but; against the order passe










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top