SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(All) 299

MOOTHAM, SAPRU
Audesh Pratap Singh – Appellant
Versus
Brij Narain – Respondent


Advocates:
Gopinath Kunzru and Amarnath Kaul, for Petitioner; G. Mehrotra and S.C. Khare, for Opposite Party.

Judgement

MOOTHAM, J. :- This is a petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution. The petitioner, Sri Audesh Pratap Singh, and respondents Nos. 4 to 11 were candidates for election to the Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly from the Bikapur East General Constituency In the district of Faizabad at the last general election, and on the 3rd February, 1952, the petitioner was declared by the Returning Officer to be duly elected. On the 14th May the respondent No. 4, Sri Mahadeo, filed an election petition challenging the election, of the petitioner on a number of grounds including the exercise of undue influence on the electors in a large number of villages in the constituency.

2. The election petition was referred to an Election Tribunal sitting at Gorakhpur of which the first respondent is the Chairman and the second and third respondents are members. Objection is taken in the petition now before us to two orders passed by the Election Tribunal. In his petition before the latter body Sri Mahadeo claimed two main reliefs, namely,

(a) that the election of Sri Audesh Pratap Singh be declared void and that he, Sri Mahadeo, be declared duly elected, and

(b) that in case he be not declared duly e






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top