BRIJ MOHAN LALL
Ram Lakhan – Appellant
Versus
Tulsha widow of Mata Prasad – Respondent
2. The plaint allegations, which have been found to be correct by the learned Munsif, are that the plaintiffs (opposite parties 1 and 2) were in peaceful possession of the land in dispute but they were, without their consent and otherwise than in due course of law, dispossessed therefrom by the applicant and other persons who were impleaded in the Court below as co-defendants and who are arrayed in this revision as opposite parties 3 to 6. These findings of fact have to be accepted as correct in these proceedings.
3. The only question of law that arises for decision is whether the suit was time-barred. In order to appreciate this question, it is necessary to mention certain facts. The plaintiffs dispossession took place on 12-7-1949. The suit was instituted in the Munsifs Court on 21-12-1949. On 3-4-1950 the plaint was ordered to be returned for presentation to "proper Court" by which term was meant the revenue Court. The plaint was actually returned on the nest day, i.e. on 4-4-19
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.