SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(All) 331

MOOTHAM, CHATURVEDI
Hafiz Mohammad Yusuf – Appellant
Versus
Custodian General, Evacuee Properties, New Delhi – Respondent


Advocates:
Syed Sadiq Ali, for Applicant; S.S. Dhawan, for Opposite Party.

Judgement

M. L. CHATURVEDI, J. :- This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution.

2. The case of the petitioner as set out in the petition is that one Abdul Hakim was the tenant, along with his brother, of a shop in the Vegetable Market, Bisheshar Ganj, Banaras. Abdul Hakims brother died about 10 years ago, and in 1948 the petitioner became a partner of Abdul Hakim in the fruit business carried on in the shop. The petitioner says that he contributed a sum of Rs. 5,000/- and that a deed of partnership was executed on the 25th October, 1943. Subsequently Abdul Hakim went to Pakistan, and a notice was issued to him in April 1950 under Section 7 of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act of that year to show cause why he should not be declared an evacuee and his property as evacuee property. No objection was filed by Abdul Hakim, and the movable property in the shop was in due course declared to be evacuee property. Subsequently however, Abdul Hakim returned to India, and, on an objection being then filed by him the order declaring him an evacuee and his property to be evacuee property was set aside.

Abdul Hakims stay in India appears to have been temporary and he again went











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top