KIDWAI, RANDHIR SINGH
Unnao Commercial Bank Ltd. , Unnao – Appellant
Versus
Kailash Nath – Respondent
BANDHIR SINGH, J.:- This appeal has been referred to a Bench by a learned Single Judge as it appeared to him that some points of importance on which, in his opinion, the law was not uniform, arose in the case and required consideration by a Bench.
2. The appeal arises out of a suit brought by the Unnao Commercial Bank, Ltd., for a partition of a half share in two houses situated in Muhalla Bashiratganj in the city of Lucknow. Baiju and Lachman Prasad, who were brothers, owned two houses and certain other property. Lachman Prasad died in 1930 leaving a son Ram Prasad who is defendant 1. Baiju died in November, 1934, without any issue. His widow Smt. Janaka, is, however, alive.
3. On the death of Baiju, Ram Prasad executed a sale deed in favour of Ratan Chand in respect of a half share in two houses and some moveable property which belonged to him and Baiju jointly. This sale deed was executed for obtaining money for filing a suit against Smt. Janaka and two others, Smt. Jasrath Dei and Mahadeo Prasad, in whose favour Baiju had executed a will which, according to Ram Prasad, was invalid. Ram Prasad was unable to finance the litigation and, in order to establish his claim to th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.