SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(All) 34

AGARWALA, NARAIN SAHAI
Radha Ballabh – Appellant
Versus
Bahore Ram Chand – Respondent


Advocates:
G.P. Bhargava and N.D. Ojha, for Appellants; Baleshwari Prasad, for Respondent.

Judgement

AGARWALA, J.:- This is a defendants appeal arising out of a suit for ejectment. The plaintiff respondent is the owner of a building which was let out to the defendant appellant under an unregistered rent note executed by the defendant-appellant. The rent agreed to be paid was from month to month at the rate of Rs.50/- per month according to the Hindi Calendar.

2. The evidence disclosed that the lease was for the purpose of establishing a Dal factory, that is, for a manufacturing purpose. The defendant-appellant held over after the expiry of the rent note and rent was accepted by the plaintiff-respondent. On the 13th January, 1950, the plaintiff-respondent gave fifteen days notice to the defendant-appellant for vacating the premises and when the defendant-appellant did not vacate, he filed the present suit for his ejectment.

The defendant-appellants contention, inter alia, was that the notice was defective inasmuch as the lease being for a manufacturing purpose he was entitled to six months notice under the provisions of S.106, T.P. Act. The trial Court held that only fifteen days notice was necessary and decreed the suit.

The lower appellate Court held that since the defendan














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top