SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(All) 229

M.L.CHATURVEDI
New India Tannery Kanpur – Appellant
Versus
M. P. Nigam – Respondent


Advocates:
M.H. Beg and G.S. Pathak, for Applicant; J. Swarup, for Opposite Party.

ORDER :- This is a petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution.

2. The facts of the case in brief are that a concern known as the Saghir Tannery of Kanpur owned machinery and some other property. The Saghir Tannery found itself in difficulties as it had to pay a sum of about Rs. 92,000/- to a bank and certain sums to a number of other of editors. The Saghir Tannery was a private limited company and the company consisted of two individuals, Mohammad Ibrahim and Jan Mohammad, who were also its Managing Directors (as appears from the copy of the sale deed filed by the petitioner in this case).

These two persons executed a registered sale deed in favour of Abdul Qaiyum and Altaf Ahmad on 30-5-1950 for a sum of Rs. 1,40,000/-. The amount, it appears, was duly paid by the purchasers, who got possession of the property sold. These two purchasers then entered into a partnership with Elahi Bux and admitted also a minor Khurshid Ahmad to the benefits of the partnership. This partnership thus consisted of four persons and it commenced its business on 8-1-1951.

A duly signed partnership deed was executed on 10-1-51. The partnership took on lease from Abdul Qaiyum and Altaf Ahmad the machinery and




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top