SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(All) 17

ASTHANA
Kasim Bhai – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
Makund Lal Agarwal, for Applicant; H.L. Kapoor, for Opposite Party.

JUDGMENT :- The applicant Kasim Bhai is the proprietor of the firm Sattar Bhai Kasim Bhai, Chemists and Druggists, in Bharthana, District Etawah. He was convicted by a first class Magistrate of Etawah under S. 27 of the Drugs Act, 1940, for contravention of sub-rules (2) and (9) of Rule 65 of the Drugs Rules and sentenced to a fine of Rs. 200/-, and also for contravention of Rule 110 to a fine of Rs. 50/-. His conviction was maintained by the learned Additional Sessions Judge of Etawah but the sentence of fine of Rs. 200/- for contravention of sub-rules (2) and (9) of Rule 65 was reduced from Rs. 200/- to Rs. 100/-. The sentence of fine of Rs. 50/- for contravention of Rule 110 was, however, maintained. He has now come up in revision to this Court.

2. It appears that the applicant has got a licence for the sale of medicines. The shop was inspected twice by the District Medical Officer of Health, once on 19-5-1953 and again on 30-5-1953. It was found that the applicant was in possession of medicines described in Schedule H of the Act but he had not engaged any qualified person for the preparation and supply of such medicines as was required under the Act.

It was also found that he had

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top