ASTHANA
Kasim Bhai – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
2. It appears that the applicant has got a licence for the sale of medicines. The shop was inspected twice by the District Medical Officer of Health, once on 19-5-1953 and again on 30-5-1953. It was found that the applicant was in possession of medicines described in Schedule H of the Act but he had not engaged any qualified person for the preparation and supply of such medicines as was required under the Act.
It was also found that he had
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.