D.S.MATHUR
Balraj Bhalla – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh Chandra Nigam – Respondent
There was a third request that a writ of mandamus be issued commanding the respondent No. 1 to refrain from admitting the evidence of impressions of thumb and toes of the petitioner in the aforementioned case.
2. None of the respondents filed a counter-affidavit, though they put in appearance through the Standing Counsel. In the circumstances, the facts as mentioned in the petition and the affidavit accompanying thereto
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.