SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(All) 168

D.S.MATHUR
Atar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
B.N. Asthana, for Applicant, Asst. Govt. Advocate, for Opposite Party.

ORDER :- This is an application in revision by Atar Singh to challenge the concurrent finding of the lower courts convicting him of an offence punishable under Sec. 19(f) of the Arms Act and sentencing him to six months R.I. for being in possession of a country made pistol and two live cartridges without holding any licence.

2. The conviction has been challenged on a legal ground and also on facts. It may here be mentioned that the finding of fact recorded by the lower courts cannot be said to be improper and hence cannot be interfered with in Revision.

3. The Arms Act, 1959, received the assent of the President on December 23, 1959, though it came into force sometimes in October 1962. The present offence was committed on 14-2-1962 and the police submitted the charge sheet and the Magistrate took cognizance of the offence long before the Arms Act, 1959, came into force. However, in view of S. 46 of the Arms Act, 1959, by which the Indian Arms Act, 1878, was repealed, it is contended that on the date the offence was committed and also on the date the Magistrate took cognizance of the offence, the Indian Arms Act, 1878, stood repealed and the prosecution could be under the Arms Act, 1








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top