SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(All) 166

B.D.GUPTA, H.C.P.TRIPATHI
Ram Khelawan – Appellant
Versus
Sudama Devi – Respondent


Advocates:
K.M. Sinha and Shambhu Pd., for Appellant; T. Rathore and S.R. Dwivedi, for Opp., Party.

Judgement

TRIPATHI, J. :- This first appeal from order is directed against an order passed by the learned Civil Judge of Faizabad on 6-9-1960 in miscellaneous case No. 25 of 1960 appointing the defendant-appellant Receiver of the property in suit and directing him to furnish security for Rs. 15,000/- for accounting and for making good any loss to the estate in case a decree was passed against him.

2. One Smt. Sudama Devi filed a suit in forma pauperis against the defendant-appellant in which she claimed a decree for possession over the properties detailed in the plaint, inter alia, on the ground that she was the only daughter and sole hear of Ram Samujh, the deceased brother of defendant-appellant, that all the properties, which were subject-matter of the suit, were properties left by deceased Ram Samujh, that the defendant had no right to possess them and she should be put in possession of the same. She also prayed for being declared a pauper and being allowed to sue in forma pauperis.

3. On the same date she also made an application under Order 39, Rule 7 read with O. 41, R. 1, C.P.C. in which she alleged that the opposite party, on hearing about the application to sue as a pauper,



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top