By the Court.—Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents.

2. Instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been preferred against the impugned order dated 26.5.2011, passed by the U.P. Public Service Commission, Allahabad, rejecting petitioner’s claim for benefit of reservation under the caste Bhotia, belonging to the category of scheduled tribe. The reason assigned therein is that in accordance with the Government order dated 9.5.2007, the caste Bhotia, does not fall within the category of scheduled tribe in the State of U.P. By assailing the impugned order, petitioner’s counsel invited attention to the notification issued under Article 342 of the Constitution of India, in the year 1967 according to which, Bhotia caste, has been included under scheduled tribe. The notification as filed with the writ petition, is reproduced as under :

“The Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) (Uttar Pradesh) Order, 1967

(C.O.78)

In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (1) of Article 342 of the Constitution of India, the President, after consultation with the Governor of the State of Uttar Pradesh, is pleased to make the following Order, namely :

1.The order may be called the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) (Uttar Pradesh) Order, 1967

2.The tribes or tribal communities, or parts of, or groups within tribes or tribal communities specified in the Schedule to this Order, shall for the purposes of the Constitution of India, be deemed to be Scheduled Tribes in relation to the State of Uttar Pradesh so far as regard members resident in that State.

THE SCHEDULE

1. Bhotia

2. Buksa

3. Jannsari

4. Raji

5. Tharu

Published with the Ministry of Law Notice No. G.S.R. 960, dated the 24th June, 1967, Gazette of India, Extraordinary, 1967, Part II, Section (1), Page 311.”

3. Aforesaid notification has got constitutional mandate and accordingly, Bhotia caste comes within scheduled tribe. Article 342 provides that the President with respect to any State, after consultation with the Governor, shall issue notification specifying the tribes or tribal communities or part of or groups within tribes or tribal communities which shall for the purposes of the Constitution be deemed to be Scheduled Tribes in relation to that State. Accordingly, the aforesaid proposition creates constitutional rights in favour of the petitioner to claim the benefit of Bhotia caste under the category of scheduled tribe.

4. Now, coming to the argument advanced by the respondents’ counsel that in view of the order dated 9.5.2007, the petitioner is not entitled to claim benefit of reservation under scheduled tribe category, seems to be misconceived argument. The Government order dated 9.5.2007 (contained in Annexure 2 to the writ petition) reveals that matter has been referred to the Government of India to exclude Bhotia, Jannsari and Raji castes since they are not available in the State of U.P. No decision has been taken by the Government of India in this regard. Whether the petitioner resides in State of U.P. or not and belongs to Bhotia caste or not, is a question of fact which may be looked into by the respondents and it is not for the Court but so far as the right of persons belonging to Bhotia community is concerned, it is well protected by the notification of the year 1967 (supra) and they may claim reservation as guaranteed (supra) belonging to scheduled tribes category. The letter dated 9.5.2007 is reproduced as under :

Þla[;k&15@19@2001&dk&2007

Ás"kd]

lqjs'k pUnz ;kno]

fo'ks"k dk;kZf/kdkjh]

mŸkj Áns'k 'kkluA

lsok esa]

lfpo]

yksd lsok vk;ksx]

mŸkj Áns'k] bykgkcknA

vuqHkkx&4 y[kuÅ % fnukad % 9 ebZ] 2007

fo"k; % mŸkj Áns'k dh vuqlwfpr tutkfr;ksa ds laca/k esaA

egksn;]

mi;qDr fo"k;d] lela[;d i= fnukad 3 twu] 2002 ds Øe esa vkidks ;g voxr djkus dk eq>s funs'k gqvk gS fd lela[;d i= fnukad 26-7-2004 ds }kjk Hkkjr ljdkj ls ;g vuqjksèk fd;k x;k Fkk fd HksfV;k] cqDlk] tkSulkjh] jkth ,oa Fkk: tutkfr;ksa esa ls ek= cqDlk vkSj Fkk