SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(All) 462

B.AMIT STHALEKAR
PREM SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Anupam Kulshreshtha for the Petitioner; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble B. Amit Sthalekar, J.—By means of this writ petition, the petitioner is challenging the orders dated 21.1.2000 and 21.5.2000 passed by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, Agra Commissioner Agra Division Agra and the Additional District Magistrate/(Finance and Revenue) Agra, respectively.

2. The facts of the case, in brief, are that a deed was executed by one Ram Babu in favour of the petitioner on 20.11.1996 in respect of the plot No. 960 area measuring 15 biswa situated in Mauja Kakretha, Tehsil and District Agra for a consideration of Rs. 5,000/-. By this deed the said Ram Babu assigned and released his rights in respect of the acquired land in question in favour of the petitioner. A Stamp duty amounting to Rs. 727/- was paid by the petitioner as per Article 55 of Schedule 1-B of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (hereinafter referred to as the Act, 1899).

3. The case of the petitioner was that the land in question had been acquired by the U.P. Awas Avam Vikas Parisad under Section 28 of the U.P. Awas Avam Vikas Parishad Adhiniyam, 1965 (hereinafter referred to as the Adhiniyam, 1965) corresponding to Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top