RAN VIJAI SINGH
BANKEY LAL – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION, JAUNPUR – Respondent
Hon’ble Ran Vijai Singh, J.—Heard Sri S.C. Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri V.D. Yadav, learned counsel for respondent No. 2, learned Standing Counsel and learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha.
2. Through this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for issuing a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 3.10.2012 passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation (in short, ‘DDC’), by which the revision filed by Sumiran against the Gaon Sabha has been allowed.
3. Sri Tripathi contends that impugned order has been passed by the learned DDC without notice to the petitioners as the petitioners were not impleaded as party in the aforesaid revision, whereas they have been materially affected by the order of the DDC. He has also brought on record the memo of the revision from the perusal of which, it transpires that only Gaon Sabha was impleaded as respondent.
4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the writ petition.
5. Learned counsel for the parties agree that the writ petition may be disposed of on its own merit on the legal premises. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is taken up for final
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.