SUDHIR AGARWAL
STATE OF U. P. – Appellant
Versus
DHAMPUR SUGAR MILLS – Respondent
Hon’ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.—Heard learned Standing Counsel for applicants-appellants and Sri Anil sharma, Advocate for respondent.
2. This is a second appeal instituted by State of U.P. through District Magistrate, Bijnor and another and has been filed beyond period of limitation by one year and 322 days, i.e., almost two years. The appeal is accompanied with this application filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act, 1963”) seeking condonation of delay. The affidavit accompanying this application gives nothing but a superficial eye wash explanation having several wide gaps in the prospective of period. In brief, the chronological events given in affidavit to explain delay, read as under:
3. In the aforesaid narration, after sending opinion by DGC on 10.3.2011, there is no explanation for a period of about one and half years and more inasmuch as the applicants applied for fresh certified copy of judgment on 1.10.2012 but what happened to earlier certified copy of judgment and what proceedings were taken, the affidavit is totally silent except of stating that earlier certified copy lost somewhere but no inquiry, no investigation and no
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.