SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(All) 1118

VINEET SARAN, B.AMIT STHALEKAR
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
RAM ADHAR PRASAD – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
S.K. Misra for the Petitioners; Anand Kumar and Sudama Ram for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—By this writ petition, the petitioners are challenging the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad dated 30.11.2012 passed in Original Application No. 851 of 2006.

2. Briefly stated the facts are that a charge-sheet was issued to the respondent alleging that while he was on sick leave on 21.8.2002, he was found in the booking office alongwith a Coolie named Bandhu for the purpose of selling fake tickets 31 in number from Lar Road to Mumbai. Thus, by this act, the respondent had violated the provisions of Rule 3.1 (i), (ii) and (iii) of the Railway Servant Conduct (Rules) 1966. Disciplinary proceedings were initiated against the respondent and on the basis of the enquiry report, the Divisional Commercial Manager, North Eastern Railway, Varanasi Disciplinary Authority passed an order on 1.6.2004 removing the respondent from service. The respondent preferred an appeal which was also rejected by the order dated 30.12.2004 passed by the Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, North Eastern Railway, Varanasi. Further revision was preferred which was also rejected by the Additional Divisional Railway Manager, North Eastern Railway, Varanasi by order dat





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top