SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(All) 1061

A.P.SAHI
MOHD. FAIZAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
J.J. Munir for the Petitioners; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble A.P. Sahi, J.—Heard Sri J.J. Munir who appears for the petitioners in this writ petition and is for Respondent Nos. 5 and 6 in Writ Petition No. 60172 of 2012. The said writ petition has been filed by one Asha Rani Ahuja also challenging the very same order which is impugned herein. The petition had been entertained on 21.11.2012 and the learned Standing Counsel had been granted ample time to file a counter-affidavit but no counter-affidavit has been filed till date. The said writ petition was connected with Writ Petition No. 52299 of 2012 also filed by one of the aggrieved candidates who is similarly situate as the petition herein. There also a counter-affidavit was called for vide order dated 8.10.2012 but till date no counter-affidavit has been filed by the State.

2. Since the issue involved is identical in all the three writ petitions relating to the same impugned order, therefore, all the three writ petitions are being disposed of finally at this stage itself. I am not inclined to grant any further time for filing counter-affidavit as the question raised can be answered on the basis of the material on record.

3. The Institution, namely, Hafiz Siddiqui Islam Int








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top