UMA NATH SINGH, SATISH CHANDRA
PRAVESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
By the Court.—We have heard learned counsel for parties and perused the pleadings of writ petition.
2. This writ petition has been filed inter alia with the prayers for issuance of (i) a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the tender notice dated 8th/11th March, 2013, issued by respondent No. 3, as contained in Annexure 1, to the writ petition; and (ii) a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding respondent No. 3 not to proceed further with the processing of tender notice dated 8th/11th March, 2013, as contained in Annexure 1 and settle the areas in question only after notifying the tender notice afresh in line with the Government Order dated 31st May, 2012 read with the judgment and order dated 29th January, 2013, passed in Writ-C No. 37725 of 2012 and other connected matters.
3. Learned counsel for petitioner Shri Akhilesh Kalra submitted that the impugned tender notice requires obtaining of Environmental Clearance Certificate within six months by the applicant, which according to him, is contrary to the judgment passed by a co-ordinate Bench at Allahabad in Writ-C No. 37725 of 2012 (Nar Narayan Mishra v. State of U.P. an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.