SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(All) 1428

ASHOK BHUSHAN, A.P.SAHI, SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
MOHD. YASIN ANSARI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.C. Sinha, R.A. Pandey and A.S.G.I. for the Appellants.

JUDGMENT

Re: Review Application No. 87350 of 2007

By the Court.—This is a review application filed by the respondent -applicants to review the judgment and order dated 21.9.2006, passed by the Full Bench of this Court.

2. Sri R.A. Pandey, learned Counsel for the applicants in support of the review application submitted that three writ petitioners; i.e. Gyanendra Singh, Inder Deo Oraon and Ishu Narayan were suffering from major disability and were discharged in category-5 hence, it was not a case of minor disability or disability of less than 40% so as not to attract the provisions of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995. He submits that notification dated 28.3.2002 issued by the Central Government in exercise of proviso to Section 47 of 1995 Act, was rightly quashed by learned Single Judge and the appellate Bench (Full Bench) erred in holding that it was not necessary to inter into merits of the validity of the notification in the appeal. He submits that it was necessary for the appellate Bench to pronounce over the validity of the said notification. Elaborating his submissions, Mr. Pandey submits that notificatio
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top