SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(All) 139

SUDHIR AGARWAL
SURENDRA NATH RAI – Appellant
Versus
ARJUN KUKREJA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Pramod Jain for the Petitioner; A.K. Gupta for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.—Heard Sri Pramod Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri A.K. Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent.

2. The facts as borne out from the record, in brief, are that there exist certain property bearing Municipal Nos. 302, 303, 304 and 305, situated at Western Kutchery Road, Meerut. It was owned by Sri Radhey Lal Singhal and Sri Surendra Singhal. The shape of property was like that of an Ahata consisting of two shops, one staircase and some open land, having a total area of about 176.57 sq. yards. One shop was in the tenancy of respondent, Arjun Kukreja, which is said to have commenced even before 1965. The petitioner purchased aforesaid property from its erstwhile owners, Sri Radhey Lal Singhal and Sri Surendra Singhal on 6.11.1971. It is said that a new plan got approved sometimes in 1977 from Meerut Development Authority and thereafter the entire existing construction was demolished and a new building was raised having three shops on the ground floor and other construction behind said shops. Besides, construction was also made on first floor and second floor. The construction of second floor consists of two rooms, verandah, kitchen an
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top