RAM SURAT RAM (MAURYA)
AMIT MOHAN MITTAL – Appellant
Versus
ATUL KUMAR GUPTA – Respondent
Hon’ble Ram Surat Ram (Maurya), J.—Heard Sri Siddharth, counsel for the petitioner and Sri Amit Kumar Singh, holding brief of Sri Nipun Singh for the respondents.
2. The writ petition has been filed for quashing the order of District Judge, Meerut dated 29.5.2012, rejecting the Application (37-C/2) of the petitioner for summoning the persons for cross-examination, whose affidavits have been filed by respondent-1 in support of his objection, in Arbitration Case No. 32 of 2010, under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation, Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).
3. Atul Kumar Gupta and Smt. Seema Gupta (respondents-1 and 2) are owners of the building, bearing Cantonment No. 182-A, Dayanand Path, Abu Lane, Meerut Cantt. The said building was let out to Amit Mohan Bansal (the petitioner) through the rent deed dated 10.4.2007 for a period of 11 months, on the monthly rent of Rs. 1,00,000/- with right to renewal for another nine times for the period of 11 months each. At the time of execution of the rent deed, Rs. 3,50,000/- was given to the lessors by way of refundable security. In this rent deed, Mukesh Kumar Garg (respondent-3), who is brother of Smt. Seema Gup
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.