Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.—Aggrieved by order dated 30.5.2013, whereby the petitioner was informed by the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (for short “BPCL”) that upon field verification, the information furnished by her in the application for LPG distributorship was found to be at variance and, therefore, her candidature is being rejected, has filed the instant writ petition for quashing the aforesaid order and for commanding BPCL to offer the LPG distributorship in question to the petitioner.

2. During pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner came to know that BPCL is proceeding to hold re-draw for selection of LPG distributorship from amongst the remaining eligible candidates and the aforesaid action was also subjected to challenge by filing an amendment application, which was allowed. Yet another amendment was sought challenging the order dated 21.6.2013 whereby the representations made by the petitioner vide her letters dated 7.6.2013 and 17.6.2013 were rejected. The said amendment was also duly allowed by order dated 24.7.2013.

3. The facts in brief giving rise to the instant petition are that the petitioner had applied for LPG distributorship at Naubasta,