SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(All) 1710

BHARAT BHUSHAN
RAMESH CHANDRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
D.R. Chaudhary and S.K. Tripathi for the Revisionist; A.G.A. for the Opposite Party.

JUDGMENT :

This criminal revision is directed against the judgement and order dated 11.1.2007 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Court No. 8, Meerut whereby the Criminal Appeal No. 99 of 2006 ( Ramesh Chandra and others Vs State of UP) arising out of Criminal Case No. 1035 of 2005 ( Case Crime No. 52 of 1990, State Vs Ramesh Chandra and others) under Sections 498-A/494 IPC and Section 3 /4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Saroorpur, District Meerut convicting the appellant and other co accused persons was partly allowed by acquitting the appellants namely Ramesh Chandra, Smt Ramkali, Smt Rajesh and Smt Mundro under Section 4 98-A IPC and Section 3 /4 Dowry Prohibition Act and further the appellant Ramesh Chandra was convicted under Section 4 94 IPC and sentenced for two years rigorous imprisonment along with fine of Rs. 1000/- with default stipulation.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the revisionist initially solemnised marriage with the complainant Smt Ramo Devi on 8.5.1984. The revisionist secured ex-parte decree of divorce on 6.1.1988 from the Addl. District Judge, Ludhiana. After the divorce the revisionist Ramesh Chandra solemnised another marriage under Special Marriage












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top